The pros and cons of circumcision


  • The rite of circumcision
  • Arguments for
  • Arguments against

  • The rite of circumcision

    There was still the custom in primitive society, when the transition
    young men in the adult male group was accompanied by a rite of initiation, or
    initiation. During the period of initiation the young men not only passed on the tradition and
    intimate knowledge of the tribe, but also subjected them to physical testing,
    among which circumcision was perhaps not the most painful. Few
    that young men might starve, they made various cuts
    skin, teeth knocked out or sawed ... At individual tribes for its
    performance using the most barbarous instruments, for example, claws
    wild animals. And to the initiation remembered for a lifetime, after the wound
    operation sprinkled with salt and pepper, to cap the ceremony the newly dedicated
    a man had to eat his own foreskin. Indeed, to forget
    It is difficult.

    The rite of circumcision was preserved among certain peoples of Australia, Oceania,
    Africa so far. But the most widespread in the world today
    circumcision received in the religious rites of Judaism (committed over
    babies) and Islam (performed on boys 7-10 years).

    With circumcision began to do not only for religious over time
    reasons. It is estimated that today, about one sixth of the male
    the world's population are circumcised. Until recently this
    operation has been popular with the overwhelming majority of Americans,
    considers it necessary sanitary and preventive measure.

    There are a set of arguments, which usually result in proving the benefit of circumcision. The most characteristic of them are as follows.

    Arguments for

    It is believed that after circumcision reduces sensitivity
    glans penis, which leads to a lengthening of intercourse and
    therefore affected by this operation if a man is able to
    partner to deliver more fun. Special studies of
    American sexologists issue revealed that
    sensitivity of the penis resulting in virtually no cutoff

    The pros and cons of circumcision
    In males affected by this operation, almost no cancer is found
    penis, and their partners rarely ill with cancer of the uterus
    (Confirmed by statistical data). A common point of view,
    that provokes the development of cancer smegma - grease
    accumulates between the foreskin and the glans. but
    recent research has revealed that clean smegma
    absolutely not carcinogenic. Push to the appearance of the tumor can
    Only dirty or infected lubricant formed for non-compliance
    elementary rules of personal hygiene.

    Some scientists cite data, according to which the gonorrhea
    and herpes occur in uncircumcised men with foreskin twice
    more often, and fungal infections, and syphilis - almost five times. this
    Statistics can be explained by the fact that the agents of these diseases
    find a favorable environment in the folds of the foreskin, as well as all the
    the disregard for the rules of hygiene and prevention, which
    acquire a special significance in the absence of a permanent partner.

    Finally, some men and their partners find that the penis
    uncircumcised foreskin simply neestetichen - question bias
    and taste. Many popular foreign editions carried out surveys among
    Women on the topic. The results of these surveys different polarity that
    once again confirms the correctness of the statements of Shakespeare: Impermanence - the name you, woman.

    It turns out that most of the essential arguments of supporters
    circumcision can reasonably support the people who live in months
    extreme conditions without water and soap or categorically do not like,
    I'm sorry, wash.

    Arguments against

    Here are some of their arguments.

    The presence of the foreskin makes the surface of the glans penis
    moist vagina corresponding humidity woman that physiological.
    Circumcised lack such natural advantages and often
    You must apply special grease.

    Practice shows that infectious diseases
    penis hit five times more children in the first years of life,
    which the foreskin circumcised. This is due to the fact that smegma
    It contains lysozyme, which reduces the risk of urinary infection

    A baby does not ask him to do surgery or not. For him
    always decide to adults. But any surgery - is an injury,
    psychological consequences that may persist for life.
    Americans carefully, even reverently relating to his
    mental health, united in a society of opponents of circumcision
    under the slogan: Circumcision - mutilation and violence against the person the baby. A
    Surgeons quite successfully develop techniques to draw
    penile skin to form a new foreskin.

    Cut off the foreskin impoverishes sexual feelings, consider
    many, and this view is quite right to exist. In
    the frictions foreskin moves, which, of course, makes the feeling
    richer in the most natural way, without the use of any
    accessories from the store of intimate accessories.

    There is no doubt that circumcision sometimes becomes necessary medical
    measure - with frequent inflammatory diseases of the foreskin, at
    phimosis and paraphimosis. However, as a preventive operation is
    hardly justified. Although until recently as a measure of prevention of angina
    across-practiced removal of the tonsils, and in order to avoid possible
    appendicitis - appendectomy cut.

    Leave a reply