Male circumcision

Content

  • Do I need an operation from a medical point of view?
  • So why?
  • «But after circumcision, he looks careful...»
  • Religious considerations
  • Hygiene of the extreme flesh


  • Do I need an operation from a medical point of view?

    The American medical community tried to find an excuse for circumcision operations, arguing that it prevents penis cancer, as well as cervical cancer and other numerous medical troubles. However, in the UK, the doctors came to the opinion that such an operation is a rather unsuccessful idea, because, according to medical research conducted in the UK, it turned out that less than 10 percent of newborn boys have medical problems with penis.

    In Sweden, where there are very rare cases of circumcision operations, penis cancer occurs as rarely as men who feel happy after circumcision. It would be interesting to compare the number of penises that were lost by their owners due to cancer (which happens quite rarely), with the number of penises, mutilated by doctors due to circumcision. And besides, circumcision can not prevent all forms of cancers of penis. One of the specialists says that he met two types of men who were not subjected to circumcision of the foreskin of the penis and had a cancer - one of them were avid smokers, and others completely neglected the hygiene body.

    According to statistics, in those countries where circumcision is not accepted, women suffer from cervical cancer diseases no more than women in America. At the same time, the main factor in the appearance of cancer diseases of the cervix can be considered a frequent change of partner men in such women, and it does not matter, they were subjected to circumcision or not. In such cases, the use of a condom can reduce the risk of cancer diseases of the cervix, but circumcision here is exactly.

    Male circumcisionAs for other statements, one of the studies showed that circumcision reduces the risk of the infections of the urethral tract during the first five years of life. In the same study it was said that parents of newborn boys who were not subjected to circumcision were instructed about that when washing a child to move the extreme flesh of his penis and wash the area under it. Most doctors instruct their parents in the opposite way, arguing that nature allegedly does not provide for the leading of the extreme flesh of male babies until they reach the age of one year. It is clear that such instructions of the doctors are caused by the fact that the boys who did not undergo circumcision often suffer from the infections of the urethral tract. However, even if the above figures are accurate, the number of infections of the urethral path is significantly higher in newborn girls than the boys, and no one offers their parents preventive surgery.

    Also sounded on the fact that men who are not subject to circumcision are more susceptible to infection with sexually transmitted sexual diseases, including AIDS. However, European men are not at all ahead of the Americans in terms of cases of infection with such diseases, although most European men have not been circumcised. Until recently, American men are among those who have not been subjected to circumcision procedure were boys from poor families. And it is known that regardless of whether circumcision has been done or not, the poor people get sick more often than rich.

    And finally, there is a myth that in male babies, if they were not circumcised, it often happens that the extreme foam of the penis does not move back. This is called a medical term - phimosis. They also say that in such cases these boys, when they grow, must be subject to a special surgical operation to fix it. In fact, only one baby from a hundred who did not undergo circumcision may face such a phenomenon. Moreover, those urologists who are more friendly belong to the extreme Penis flesh can easily eliminate this defect without resolving.


    So why?

    The doctor in the USA usually receives from 150 to 300 dollars for the operation to circumcise the extreme flesh of the penis. Thus, making one such operation per day, it receives $ 150, and if it makes five operations per week at a price of $ 150 per surgery, then minus six weeks of vacation, it earns $ 34,500 only on circumcision, operations, which actually lasts no more than 10 minutes. And this is if we assume that he makes only one such operation a day and takes only $ 150. It is not surprising that pediatricians and gynecologists sometimes come into martial arts with those who make such operations!

    Another reason for circumcision is the preconceived opinion of doctors. Until recently, some doctors in our country have long tried to convince other doctors in the fact that hysterectomy (surgical surgery to remove the uterus) is very well reflected on the health of women, as well as circumcision - on the health of men. And even earlier, they told for the operations of cesarean section, which allegedly much better than the usual births, if we take into account that such operations are very beneficial from their (economic) point of view, as well as more predictable on their results.

    In short, from all of the above, we can conclude that there is no one special from a medical point of view of the reasons for the mandatory removal of the foreskin of the penis, except for a potential source of income for doctors who practice such operations. And this again suggests that Nature was very wisely entered, providing the penis of men of extreme flesh. In the extreme flesh of the penis there are many nervous endings that play a big role in obtaining men of sexual pleasure. In addition, the extreme flesh helps the penis head to save moisture and provides additional skin slip along the penis rod during intercourse or masturbation. The extreme foam of the penis is extremely elastic and, as they say, is satisfied with sensitive to touch, especially touch of human lips. Thus, the extreme flesh is not at all useless, but even a pretty pleasant belonging of the penis, thanks to which you can get a lot of pleasure.



    «But after circumcision, he looks careful...»

    People in those countries where women's genitals usually urged, are sure that they look better if most of them are just cut. That is what they usually do. Moreover, this is usually the fact that they are later contemplated. And men's genitals, worried through surgical intervention, is what we used to see in our country.

    During the operation to circumcise the doctors, the special tool is pierced with extreme flesh of the penis and cut it off from the penis head. Thus, the penis is deprived of one third part of its flesh. Traditionally, such operations are made without anesthesia, but even if they are conducted under anesthesia, pain still makes itself felt due to fresh scar, which remains on the penis.



    Religious considerations

    Some people may argue: «But circumcision is made on the basis of important religious considerations and in accordance with established cultural traditions». The same applies to circumcision of a part of the female genitals, on which we, Western people, look at the ugliness.

    Some people believe that a dismissive attitude to circumcision is a manifestation of disrespect for the ritual traditions of the Jewish religious faith. And it is true. However, we are also disrespectful about the traditions of the Catholic Church, which prohibits the use of contraceptives and masturbation. And if Jewish men want to undergo circumcision in order to thus express adherence to their religious views, then why not wait with it before they reach majority. After all, it will be a more significant expression of the commitment of his faith than just to allow you to pull the penis tip at the time when you just a few days from the family and when you can not distinguish torus from the phone directory.



    Hygiene of the extreme flesh

    Actually arises much more worries with a child who made circumcision than with the one to whom he did not do it. Parents of male children up to one year are usually advised to delay the extreme flesh (or what it remains after cutting) and thoroughly rinse the penis head area under it.

    If your baby did not cut circumcision, then do not try to delay it with extreme flesh. It is always better to leave her alone until it is easy to delay.

    Regardless of whether the circumcision did your son or not if his penis is a bit inflamed for the first three days and has a reddish tint, then you should immediately consult a doctor. If the doctor advises to make you circumcision, then you will definitely consult with another doctor to find out his opinion too.

    Leave a reply