Pot protection: each his

With the thermoregulation, a person was lucky much more than many animals: we do not need to sit in talks with a dried language, it is not necessary to make saliva skin in a crowded metro car. Man just sweats, and his sweat even almost smells. Exactly until the case will take off the bacteria on the skin, after which the effect arises, with which funds from sweat are designed.

Content

Each Dodiga has its own technique

Operating principle
deodorants to suppress the activity of bacteria in
output ducts of sweat glands. That is, when using deodorant
do not stop sweat, but you already exude not so sharp fragrance. IN
translate from a French deodorant and is «destroying smell».

Antiperspirant
Works on the principle: who does not sweat, he does not smell. That is, his
The action is based on temporarily block output
Sweat iron. Dispute on the topic «What better?» Usually reduced K
clarifying what type of means of sweat is more efficient and what is safer
for good health. The results of this dispute are predictable as the work of the game
automatic.

We will be brief: in the nomination «the safest» Lidizes
Deodorant: He does not prevent us sweating. Antiperspirant, undoubtedly, where
More efficiently deodorant. But there are two nuances: antiperspirant sweat
interferes – that is, does not allow the body to fully cool. And also: in
Antipers welded as a active substance are used salts
aluminum or zinc, which also does not benefit the organism. AND,
Finally, no first year circulate stubborn rumors that regular
The use of antiperspirants can lead to breast cancer.

Today is an antiperspirant, tomorrow – crayfish?

IN
The framework of one article to solve once and for all, leads to use
antiperspirates to cancer or not, it would be too
Sophue. However, to reproduce the plot canvas of this story is easy.

Some
years ago broke out thunder: European and American media choir
spoke about the dangers of antiperspirant. The claim was formulated as follows:
The risk of breast cancer is allegedly provoked by the antiperspirant
blocks swelling glands, resulting in lymph nodes
Toxins begin to accumulate. And this, in turn, can lead to
tumors. This information was presented as a leak of secret data
Medical research. She could have the right to exist,
if it was still clear how blocked sweat was connected
glands and lymphatic system.

The shelf life of deodorant or
The antiperspirant may indicate the number of contained in it
Preservatives. The less shelf life – the less preservatives.
However, something depends on the packaging. For example, most
Preservatives in dry Deodorants-sticks.

But for sprays
Do not worry: the contents of the cans are not available to air,
Accordingly, preservatives on an industrial scale in the sprey
Will it turn out.

Doctors unanimously responded to the deposit of the media: journalists
incorrectly interpreted the information that emanated from the scientific community and in
The result was spawned a hearing, which became a serious social problem.
Noise around the potential harm of antiperspirant indirectly
provoked several additional research.

Experiments
Based on information received by doctors a few years ago:
Some substances falling into the human body, including
Cadmium and aluminum, are able to imitate the action of hormone estrogen. BUT
Here is estrogen (and estrogen-like compounds) in turn can
Cancel breast cancer. As a result, Dr. Dhere from Riding
University, who led the studies, said that «Each is
studied agents separately may not provide serious
influence», However, it was to find out what effect causes from
Interaction in the body. Thus, information about what exactly
Aluminum salts contained in antiperspirants affect education
malignant tumors, was not confirmed.

but
Concerned European consumers consoleted only for a while. Soon
The second wave of rumors about the dangers of not only antiperspirants, but also
Deodorants. Under the suspicion fell parabens – Preservatives,
Hygienic cosmetics. Doctors organized again
Several studies and again did not confirm these accusations. But
The situation turned out to be in a joke, where «spoons returned, and unpleasant
The precipitate remained». Researchers continue to firm that
Modern antiperspirants and deodorants do not contain any single
substances capable of provoking the development of malignant
neoplasms, but the reputation of these funds against the sweat is still
Podmed.

What can and what can not

In disputes about,
what remedy against sweat is the most reliable and at the same time the most
Safe, no winners. This means that for each situation and
For each skin type there is its solution.